Monsanto Blocked – Mexican Farmers Halt Law to Privatize Plants and Seeds
5th June 2012By Occupy Monsanto
Progressive
small farmer organizations in Mexico scored a victory over
transnational corporations that seek to monopolize seed and food
patents. When the corporations pushed their bill to modify the Federal
Law on Plant Varieties through the Committee on Agriculture and
Livestock of the Mexican Chamber of Deputies on March 14, organizations
of farmers from across the country sounded the alarm. By organizing
quickly, they joined together to pressure legislators and achieved an
agreement with the legislative committee to remove the bill from the
floor.
What’s at stake is free
and open access to plant biodiversity in agriculture. The proposed
modifications promote a privatizing model that uses patents and “Plant
Breeders’ Rights” (PBR) to deprive farmers of the labor of centuries in
developing seed. The small farmers who worked to create this foundation
of modern agriculture never charged royalties for its use.
Although
the current law, in effect since 1996, pays little heed to the rights
of small farmers, the new law would be far worse. Present law tends to
benefit private-sector plant breeders, allowing monopolies to obtain
exclusive profits from the sale of seeds and other plant material for up
to 15 years, or 18 in the case of perennial ornamental, forest, or
orchard plants–even when the plants they used to develop the new
varieties are in the public domain.
The
legislative reform would extend exclusive rights from the sale of
reproductive material to 25 years. Further, it seeks to restrict the
rights of farmers to store or use for their own consumption any part of
the harvest obtained from seeds or breeding material purchased from
holders of PBRs.
The proposed law would also include genetically modified organisms (GMOs) among the plant varieties covered, converging with the so-called Monsanto
Law (Law of Biosecurity and Genetically Modified Organisms). This is an
absurd inclusion, since GMOs are created by introducing genetic
material from non-plant species.
GMOs
cannot be considered a distinct variety, because they do not result
from the genetic variability that underlies natural selection. They are
the result of manipulation through biotechnology that crosses the
boundaries between species and realms. Another absurdity is the private
appropriation of genetic information from live organisms, even those
altered with genes of other species.
The
proposed law would create a “Monsanto Police,” by giving the National
Service for the Inspection and Certification of Seeds the authority to
order and conduct inspection visits, demand information, investigate
suspected administrative infractions, order and carry out measures to
prevent or stop violations of PBR, and impose administrative sanctions,
which are increased by the proposal. It would have a government agency
promote PBRs held by individuals or corporations.
Holders
of PBRs already gain exclusive rights to exploit plant varieties and
material for their propagation. The bill under consideration would
extend those rights over the products resulting from use of monopolized
plant varieties so that, for example, a special license would have to be
obtained to use the variety in foods for human consumption or
industrial uses.
Farmers Win a Battle, but the Offensive Continues
Now
that the regular session has been concluded and the bill wasn’t
presented, it will have to wait for a new session. Withdrawal of the
bill was a victory for the social organizations over the transnational
beneficiaries of the bill, particularly Monsanto.
The
battle was won, but the bill is still pending as Monsanto and other
large corporations wait for a better time. With Mexican elections just
months away, they’re waiting for a time when the political cost of these
measures that harm producers’ rights won’t have immediate electoral
repercussions.
As now formulated, the
reform would further strengthen the legal underpinnings for pillage
that the Mexican Congress has been shaping since the North American Free
Trade Agreement (NAFTA) began to be negotiated and then went into
effect. The proposed reforms derive directly from the intellectual
property agreements contained in annex 1701.3 of NAFTA.
In
2005, the Monsanto Law opened the door for cultivating genetically
modified seed in Mexico. The seed is the property of the same
transnational corporations that produce the agricultural chemicals used
on the GMOs, to their own benefit and the detriment of the food supply,
health, and economic well being of the Mexican people.
When
the reforms went through the Senate and Chamber committee, members of
the Mexican Congress–with the exception of members of the Party of the
Democratic Revolution–tossed caution aside and disregarded the warnings
of scientists not paid by the transnationals. They decided to forget
that small farmers and native peoples, with their ancestral practices of
cultivation, selection, and free interchange of seeds, are the ones who
created existing plant varieties and are the real owners of the
agro-genetic wealth of the country.
Organizations
of small farmers declared their opposition because the proposed reforms
would deepen the crisis of Mexican agriculture and increase poverty and
food dependency, both of which have increased alarmingly under the
present administration.
The
organizations presented a document to the leaders of all factions in the
Chamber of Deputies requesting them to send the proposed law back to
Committee. They demanded that the legislature open up a discussion on
the inadvisability of continuing to privatize the means of production of
foodstuffs, given the Mexican government’s obligation to uphold the
right to food.
The right to food was
only recently approved as a constitutional reform in Mexico. The United
Nations Special Rapporteur for the Right to Food, Olivier De Schutter,
anticipated the debate by stressing the need to strengthen the legal
framework to oppose the reform on Plant Varieties already approved by
Congressional Committee.
In the final
report of his visit to Mexico, submitted a few weeks ago, the UN
official said that Mexico should approve a law establishing a framework
for the right to food, declare a moratorium on planting genetically
modified corn, and adopt measures against the monopolization of the
production of seeds.
In addition,
farmers argue that the nation needs community seed banks and
decentralized, participatory programs to conserve agricultural
biodiversity. The organizations are preparing to extend the debate and
launch legal action against the bill, such as filing injunctions and
claims of unconstitutionality, since Article 27 of the Mexican
Constitution protects the genetic diversity of species as part of the
national patrimony.
Source - occupymonsanto360.org
No comments:
Post a Comment